Notwithstanding their ancestral origins, Jews in general are God-fearing people. The inclusion of the history of Khazaria is not intended to insinuate that Jews of today are practising pagans. Not only Jews but also some Christians and Muslims around the world alike have ancestral links to Khazaria. However, devil-worshiping elites pose themselves as Jews, persecuted Jews, to safeguard themselves and their agenda from unfavourable criticism. It is conveyed in history books that Jews were persecuted throughout history due the implementation of usury by moneylenders who happened to be Jewish. Jewish persecution was not motivated by religious differences. The conflict between Israel and Palestine is not a religious one, it is purely political. Prior to the Zionist occupation of Palestine, no tensions existed between Jews, Christians and Muslims when in fact were living amongst each other in harmony.
The Holocaust was necessary for the establishment of Israel, the Devil’s headquarters. The state of Israel is not intended to be the holy land of either Christians, Jews or Muslims. It is intended for sinister means.
The rationale adopted by Hitler’s Nazi National Socialist Party was generally based on the notion of elevating the presumed superior Aryan race to a position where it held global authority in all facets of life. The Nazi rationale was derived from the works of Karl Marx, the founder of Marxism. Not only did Marx influence Nazi policies but is also primarily known for inspiring the emergence of Communism.
Modern-day liberal democracy has no founding origins but rather is a political theory which is an improved, polished disguise for global totalitarianism replacing Fascism and Communism . The alienation of religion, which is evident today, was introduced by Marx which factored into the works of Charles Darwin that led him in developing the evolutionary theory. The thought that
Charles Darwin influenced
Karl Marx’s work is unfounded. Marx’s
‘Communist Manifesto’ was published in 1848 whereas Darwin’s
‘On the Origin of Species'
was released a decade later in 1859.
More to the point, Nazism was heavily influenced by Marxism as is modern-day Democratic Liberalism. Karl Marx was a Satanist as reflected by his views on God, in not only his philosophical writings but also in his literary works. In Marx’s poem ‘Invocation of One in Despair’, revenge is sought against God for dispossessing him of his all. In all monotheistic religions, in one way or another, convey that Satan who at one point was an Advocate of God became His adversary upon His creation of Adam. God held a higher regard to His creation of Adam over Satan which led to Satan feeling betrayed. Satan expressed his disdain in this regard and was banished from heaven and condemned to hell for eternity. Satan then proclaimed that he shall corrupt the offspring of Adam and lead them down the path of damnation. To achieve this, Satan induced Adam and Eve to transgress the orders of God and eat the fruit from the forbidden tree. Now, here is the poem
‘Invocation of One in Despair’ by Karl Marx which reads:
“So a God has snatched from me my all
In the curse and rack of Destiny.
All his worlds are gone beyond recall!
Nothing but revenge is left to me!
On myself revenge I'll proudly wreak,
On that being, that enthroned Lord,
Make my strength a patchwork of what's weak,
Leave my better self without reward!
I shall build my throne high overhead,
Cold, tremendous shall its summit be.
For its bulwark-- superstitious dread,
For its Marshall--blackest agony.
Who looks on it with a healthy eye,
Shall turn back, struck deathly pale and dumb;
Clutched by blind and chill Mortality
May his happiness prepare its tomb.
And the Almighty's lightning shall rebound
From that massive iron giant.
If He bring my walls and towers down,
Eternity shall raise them up, defiant.”
The only being known to have sought revenge against God is Satan, so is Marx here professing to be Satan? Or more so acting as Satan’s mouthpiece? If you think neither of the two, doesn’t it seem odd for Marx to seek revenge against an Omnipotent Being that he thinks doesn’t exist? Also, isn’t it counterintuitive of Marx, as an atheist, in his literature, to take the form of Satan, another being which, as an atheist, would not believe exists, in seeking revenge against God?
Indeed, Marx sought revenge against God. In
‘A Criticism of the Hegelian Philosophy of Right’
Marx says
“The criticism of religion disillusions man, so that he thinks, acts, shapes his reality like the disillusioned man come to his senses, so that he revolves around himself, and thus around his real sun. Religion is but the illusory sun which revolves around man, so long as he does not revolve around himself."
Hitler, much like Marx was a socialist. Albeit his differentiating socialist policies to the ones of Marx, Hitler was nevertheless a socialist. Hitler used the rationale behind the Communist Manifesto to forge his own different variant of socialism. Here is an example extracted from
Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf:
“Fundamentally every kind of work has a double value; the one material, the other ideal. The material value depends on the practical importance of the work to the life of the community. The greater the number of the population who benefit from the work, directly or indirectly, the higher will be its material value. This evaluation is expressed in the material recompense which the individual receives for his labour. In contradistinction to this purely material value there is the ideal value. Here the work performed is not judged by its material importance but by the degree to which it answers a necessity. Certainly the material utility of an invention may be greater than that of the service rendered by an everyday workman; but it is also certain that the community needs each of those small daily services just as much as the greater services. From the material point of view a distinction can be made in the evaluation of different kinds of work according to their utility to the community, and this distinction is expressed by the differentiation in the scale of recompense; but on the ideal or abstract plans all workmen become equal the moment each strives to do his best in his own field, no matter what that field may be. It is on this that a man’s value must be estimated, and not on the amount of recompense received.”
I don’t intend here to dwell on the particulars of policies of Marx or Hitler. I intend to show you that the foundations of socialism is pure EVIL. This is evident through the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and the 100 million plus deaths in Communist States throughout the twentieth century.
This is a verse from one of Marx's plays called
Oulanem:
'And we, we Apes of a cold God, still cherish
With frenzied pain upon our loving breast
The viper so voluptuously warm,
That it as Universal Form rears up
And from its place on high grins down on us!'
In the above verse, the character in the play, which is presumed to be based on Karl Marx himself, literarily claims to be the devil. The phrase
'Ape of God'
refers to a person who mimics God, chiefly in the proverb "the devil is God's ape".
I'll leave you with one of Epictetus's Discourses which speaks on the Rational Faculty:
“Of all the faculties (except which I shall soon mention), you will find not one which is capable of contemplating itself, and, consequently, not capable either of approving or disapproving. How far does the grammatic art possess the contemplating power? As far as forming a judgement about what is written and spoken. And how far is music? As far as judging about melody. Does either of them then contemplate itself? By no means. But when you must write something to your friend, grammar will tell you what words you should write; but whether you should write or not, grammar will not tell you. And so it is with music as to musical sounds; but whether you should sing at the present time and play on the lute, or do neither, music will not tell you. What faculty will then tell you? That which contemplates both itself and all other things. And what is this faculty? The rational faculty; for this is the only faculty that we have received which examines itself, what it is, and what power it has, and what is the value of this gift, and examines all other faculties: for what else is there which tells us that golden things are beautiful, for they do not say so themselves? Evidently it is the faculty which is capable of judging appearances. What else judges of music, grammar, and the other faculties, proves their uses, and points out the occasions for using them? Nothing else”.
The rational faculty is a gift possessed by every individual. Every individual possesses an intrinsic rational faculty. Use it.
Article by Adham Tebbie
Click or Tap on Opinions for more articles by Adham.