Woman Shot in Capitol Building In Washington D.C

In a utopian society, the politicians present at the Capitol Building, without fear, should have taken the opportunity to implement their leadership skills, addressing the rioters collectively and encouraging them to convey their concerns for them to be addressed. But no politician possesses such courage and leadership skills in order to do so.

No Copyright Infringement Intended - Intended for Fair Use pursuant to Section 107 of the Copyright Act - Creator: SAUL LOEB | Credit: AFP - Getty Images

This image is depicting a man wearing a Norse Viking Raider Helmet who managed to intrude into the Capitol Building along with a group of trespasses including the two men besides him and the people seen in the background. The first aspect of this photo to grip my attention was the Viking Raider Helmet the face-painted man was wearing. A Raider is referred to as someone who attacks an enemy in their territory. Either this man left the trump rally to dress the part of someone who is going to raid a building and then returned or he conveniently had a Viking Raider Helmet in his possession when the Stampede towards the Capitol Building began.

The next aspect of this image to catch my attention was the intruders coincidently bumping into media photographers in an area inside the Capitol Building which happened to be a perfect setting for taking photographs. I find it quite odd that rioters to stopped to adhere to the request of photographers to pose for the camera. The man is seen making a hand gesture, implying that he was posing for the camera. 

Source: Sky News

In this image, the tattoo on the left-side of the man’s chest caught my attention. It’s a tattoo of 3 triangles intertwining in the centre of one another. The number 3 and triangles are commonly used as symbolism by Kabbalists for the purposes of manifesting their ideas to life. More on this can be found in this article here.

Analysis of Footage Showing Woman Being Shot

Warning

I must warn you that viewer’s discretion is advised. The following footage contains graphic scenes that have not been blurred out. This video also contains explicit language which has not also NOT been edited out. This video depicts the shooting of the victim. AGAIN, PLEASE HEED THIS WARNING.

The Shooter

As mentioned above, it was reported that the shooter was a United States Capitol Police Officer in plain clothing. You could see that the shooter was wearing a suit, a pair of gloves and a face mask. A suit is a peculiar outfit selection for a policer given the task to safeguard the Congress, Members of Congress, employees, visitors, and Congressional buildings and grounds from crime, disruption, and terrorism. One would think that a suit would limit one’s mobility and thus not the best option to wear as a Police Officer in Plain Clothes.

Yes, the suit has caused me to question whether the shooter was in fact a USPC officer but only after realising the following detail. There were other USPC officers present at the scene. If the shooter was concerned to the point where he feels the need to shoot at an intruder, then why didn’t he communicate to his fellow Police Officers that back-up is required at the barricade which he was guarding? As a Police Officer he must’ve had a communication device in his possession through which he can communicate with other officers. Communication device such as an earpiece or walkie talkie. Given what happened, it is appropriate to say that there were no channels of communication between the shooter and the officers at the scene. For these reasons, I am in the view that the reports of the shooter being a Plain Clothes Police Officer is a lie.

Moreover, I am in the view that the shooter intended to kill the woman he shot, rather than neutralising any threat she presented by climbing the barricade. According to The Washington Examiner, the woman was shot in the neck then later carried out of the building on a stretcher. Here is a slowed down snippet from the video above, the purpose of this snippet is to ascertain what portion of the woman’s body was a visible target in the eyes of the shooter.

Warning

I must warn you that viewer’s discretion is advised. The following footage contains graphic scenes that have not been blurred out. This video also contains explicit language which has not also NOT been edited out. This video depicts the shooting of the victim. AGAIN, PLEASE HEED THIS WARNING.

The start of the clip portrays the shooter aiming his gun towards the middle of the barricade right before he instantaneously aims up and fires his weapon. This man is professional. If he can hit the neck of his target in a second then he is surely capable of hitting a part of the body that would not kill someone as a result. The video shows that the woman was standing on the edge of the barricade as she was shot. It is clear that the shooter had other clear body targets to aim at but opted to shoot at her neck/shoulder area. He could have fired a warning shot at the wall near the woman, shot her leg or arm to prevent her from crossing the barrier. Alas, had she did cross the barricade, he could have shot her leg or arm or perhaps even tackled her to the floor and apprehended her. Shooting her in the neck was not their only option, he wanted to cause her severe harm.

I am not in the view that the shooter was a USCP officer but rather an agent for the Secret Service. The shooter is a trained professional, it is evident in the slowed clip above.  Rather than keeping aim to ensure the threat was neutralised, he lowers his weapon before the woman falls back onto the floor behind her. He knew he hit the target as soon as he fired his weapon. Here is another video showing the shooting from a different angle.

Warning

I must warn you that viewer’s discretion is advised. The following footage contains graphic scenes that have not been blurred out. This video also contains explicit language which has not also NOT been edited out. This video depicts the shooting of the victim. AGAIN, PLEASE HEED THIS WARNING.

Source: Watch the Original Video Here

As you can see in the video, the woman was shot after standing on the edge of the barricade for just a second. This implies that the shooter had barely just a second of reaction time in which to aim then shoot. In that one second reaction time, he shot her neck. Her neck had a flag wrapped around it, yet the shooter was still able to hit her neck, further insinuating that he was a trained professional. American Politicians have trained assassins for protection.

The Police Officers Present at Time of Shooting

Why weren't the Police Officers present at the scene not safeguarding the barricade? Wouldn’t they have been informed on the potential level of risk imposed should people have past the barricade? For what other reason would the shooter have fired his weapon other than that to neutralise a very serious threat?

In the first video, after the shot was fired, a police officer can be seen kneeling down to look at the woman then stood up right again, raised his weapon across towards the hall then began gesturing hand signals to someone from across the hall, followed by a thumbs up. First of all, news outlets are reporting that Police Officers were quick to rush to the aid of the wounded victim and that is a lie. The Police officer kneeled down but did not ensure to see whether the woman was okay. Also even though blood noticeably began to come out of her mouth, they still did not turn to her aid. 

Secondly, what was the reason behind the Police Officer raising his firearm towards across the hall? Did he raise his weapon out of suspicion that maybe there was a lone gunman on the other side of the barricade? Only then to realise that his fellow officers are across the hall and give them a thumbs up? Lastly, again why weren’t the officers at the scene safeguarding the barricade? They were right there, thus if in fact the shooter was a USCP Officer he should have known that fellow officers were nearby enough to not take drastic action.

Opinion

To the readers who happen to be police officers, I have two questions to ask you. The first question is ‘taking into account the circumstances surrounding the shooting, were there other measures presently available for the shooter to take in order to prevent the woman from crossing the barricade other than shooting her in the neck?’. The second question is ‘taking into account the circumstances surrounding the shooting, were the police officers behind the rioters in a position to prevent the shooting from happening?’. I absolutely think that the riot and how it was handled was utterly bizarre!! Some people made it to the chambers and took photos whereas others were shot dead.

Catalytic event upon catalytic event upon catalytic event occurring around the world and not once has any Government been questioned as to whether it had a role to play in any of those catalytic event. No one would dare, the politicians are the shining light of our society. What absolute garbage. Until people start questioning the conduct of their politicians, there are going to be consistent occurrences of catalytic events until you surrender your freedom of will. 

The United States of America is finished. Sabotaged by both the Republic and Democratic Parties. Destroyed by White and Black people. The day that American people realise that all the atrocities are not politically motivated, the sooner the country can begin its healing process. Events such as the Capitol Hill Riot are instigated by agents who at the behest of Government Officials and foreign entities infiltrate political groups to motivate civil unrest.

Just hours before the riot erupted, Donald Trump held a rally on Pennsylvania Avenue; down the road from the Capitol Building. Trump, to conclude his rally speech, urged people to march down to the Capitol Building in protest. Law enforcement agencies, in particular the Seattle Police Department and the United States Capitol Police had at least an hour to take appropriate actions to ensure that the Capitol Building was safeguarded against civil unrest. Necessary precautions were not met which resulted in rioters being able to access the Parliament Building. The riot was initiated by Donald Trump then instigated by agents of the power elite and facilitated by negligence on the part of law enforcement agencies.

Nevertheless, the United States is purposely being destroyed by those in Government. The Republican Party does not look likely to win the 2024 and 2028 elections, resulting in the nation being split into 2 separate states, thus dividing the power of the United States of America. All riots in 2020 and those to come in 2021 will be a ploy to divide and conquer. Once the United States is divided, China and Russia along with Israel will usurp the United States as the most powerful countries in the world.

Article By Adham Tebbie

Click or Tap on Opinions for more articles by Adham.